COMP30290/COMP41190 
			 Natural Computing 
		      10 Page Paper Review Form


1.  REVIEWER'S STATEMENT:

- I have read this paper.

- I do not have an especially close relationship (or an antagonistic relationship) with the author.

- This review is my own opinion and work and has not been delegated to anyone.

- I have not discussed my review of this paper with any other peer reviewer for this module.


__ Yes (indicates a "yes" to all of the above items for this particular paper)



2. RELEVANCE TO THIS MODULE:  Is the subject of this paper relevant to this module?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



3. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROBLEM: Is the subject of this paper important?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



4. CLEAR IDENTIFICATION OF A PROBLEM: Does the paper have a clearly stated problem to address?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



5. ACHIEVEMENT OF STATED OBJECTIVE:  Does the paper clearly establish its main point (problem, issue, etc.) and stay focused and deliver on this stated objective?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



6.WRITING QUALITY:  How good is the organization, sentence structure, mechanics (e.g. figures, tables), spelling, and, above all, the clarity of this paper?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



7. REPLICABILITY:  If the paper describes an experiment, is there adequate information in the paper to permit replication of the experiment?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



8. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES:  Is there anything that needs to be added/corrected/subtracted from the bibliography?

Rate on Scale of 1-10:  
Comments:



9.  SUGGESTIONS TO AUTHOR FOR IMPROVING THIS PAPER:  Regardless of the rating you are giving to this paper, what suggestions would you make to the author to improve this paper (e.g., minor and major errors or omissions, unclear points, etc.) ?

Comments:



10.  ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:



11. ABSOLUTE RECOMMENDATION (1-10) OF PAPER: Based on your overall opinion of
the paper is it acceptable for a conference in Natural Computing.


	8-10) definitely accept as full paper

	6,7) probably accept as full paper

	5) definitely accept as abstract (short paper)

	4) probably accept as abstract (short paper)

	3) probably reject outright

	1,2) definitely reject outright


Your recommendation (1-10):



12. RELATIVE (NUMERICAL RATING) RECOMMENDATION OF PAPER:  You have a total of 40 points to allocate among 2 papers. Assign more points to a better paper.  Allocate ALL of these 40 points for the 2 papers so that the sum of your allocations totals 40 points: